Become a ltxtech.com member, Click here to register!

View Poll Results: Should the date of the LTX Shootout be changed?

Voters
15. You may not vote on this poll
  • No, it should be on Labor Day weekend

    4 26.67%
  • Yes, it should be during a cooler time of year

    11 73.33%
Page 9 of 21 FirstFirst ... 567891011121319 ... LastLast
Results 81 to 90 of 204
  1. #81
    "The Rock"


    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Name
    Popo
    Vehicle
    1996 Impala with the heart of the old camaro. 1993 Corvette..
    Location
    Shillington, Pennsylvania, United States
    Posts
    61,345

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ZOHAN View Post
    I wasnt meaning to be disrespectful. Ive gotten plenty of that from certain people. But everything i said was facts. Right? Im sorry that for some reason you have this thing against me ever since i was trying to sell a shortblock and being an "unmotivated seller" because i didnt push it on someone that was looking for something else specifically. Im not trying to be "banned". Ill just continue here trying to avoid any confrontation with you like i have the past two years with a bad taste in my mouth and keep to myself. And very seldom here in the past year over things said as well. Again, hope this isnt my one more to get me banned, but felt i should at least answer

    Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

    Only since you asked, will I answer, however this is the end of the discussion. No, not everything you said was fact. Your accusation of me thinking there was "embezzling" was not "fact." That is something that your group came up with, and Im not sure from where. With that being said, no this is not your one more and banned. I have done everything I can to save you from being banned by me, and am glad you opted to stick around. You dont need to like me, talk to me, respond to my posts, and as long as you are not disrespectful, that is all totally fine. Glad you chose to stick around. Enjoy the forum and the incredible community that we have here.


    Our BIG MOMENT @ the 2012 LTXshootout

    http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=521756391174175

    1996 Camaro Z28: RIP 09/25/2016

    1994 Trans Am GT: SOLD 05/2017

    1985/1996GS clone: SOLD

    1996 Impala SS H/C, LT, with true dual exhaust, 4.10s, lowered, with CPT trans, many cosmetic mods, and a whole lot more to come...

    2002 Caddilac EscaladeL CAI, lowered, 6.0 , AWD..





  2. #82

    Default

    Lettuce be cereal here, how can one honestly avoid the scourge of a poster called @popo8 ?

    Shit ain't possibru.

    Correlation does not imply causation.

    Una salus victis nullam sperare salutem

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to shownomercy For This Post:


  4. #83
    "The Rock"


    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Name
    Popo
    Vehicle
    1996 Impala with the heart of the old camaro. 1993 Corvette..
    Location
    Shillington, Pennsylvania, United States
    Posts
    61,345

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by shownomercy View Post
    Lettuce be cereal here, how can one honestly avoid the scourge of a poster called @popo8 ?

    Shit ain't possibru.

    U know... to think there was a time when I would see ur posts and think... THIS GUY IS A DICK... I never thought the day would come where I could say ur posts almost always make me laugh.

    Thanku.

    LTXtech.com IS my drug...


    Our BIG MOMENT @ the 2012 LTXshootout

    http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=521756391174175

    1996 Camaro Z28: RIP 09/25/2016

    1994 Trans Am GT: SOLD 05/2017

    1985/1996GS clone: SOLD

    1996 Impala SS H/C, LT, with true dual exhaust, 4.10s, lowered, with CPT trans, many cosmetic mods, and a whole lot more to come...

    2002 Caddilac EscaladeL CAI, lowered, 6.0 , AWD..





  5. The Following User Says Thank You to popo8 For This Post:


  6. #84

    Default

    There is something that I would like to address as far as the shootout. (Getting back on track!)

    The weight penalty for having a 4L80e.

    So everyone knows I'm going to do the 24x on the shop car. I am also going to swap a 4l80e, because it is just crazy not to. However, with it being a stronger transmission-it also has its own weight and time penalty built in. It is PROVEN to take more power to turn the 80e as opposed to the 60e. Which is a penalty in and of its self. Moreover, the 80e weighs more than the 60e already!

    So there are two reasons why I think the penalty should be removed. First because of the two points above. Secondly, because the 4L80e can be ran by an LT1 PCM.

    I understand why the 24x carries a weight penalty, it is a better system.

    But with the 80e its only a upgrade in the sense of what power it can handle, but if you go straight from a working 60e to an 80e and keep everything the same you will lose time and power. So the weight penalty adds insult to injury

    Plus if I run in extreme street, my car will have to weigh 3750 with the 80e and the 24x which is more than the car weighs stock weight with me in it.

    So currently I need a ( @popo8 Stop Reading here, and skip past the comma.) dead body for my trunk, or a willing LTxer to try and fit in the trunk while I run in a FULL WEIGHT TRANS AM with added weight.
    Last edited by green96ta; 09-13-2015 at 10:32 AM.

    Call for all of your wiring needs! LTX, LSX, Stand Alone, S10, Full Size Trucks, DIY Kits, Extensions, and Pigtails!

  7. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to green96ta For This Post:


  8. #85
    VIP Member


    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Name
    KYLE
    Vehicle
    95 MQBM Z28
    Location
    davison michigan
    Posts
    3,874

    Default

    question... with turbo and supercharged guys , they way you limit there power is by sizing correct?... why not do that in the extreme street power adder class and limit every guy to a certain jet size? seems like no one wants to pony up money for a direct port, or most don't need one for a smaller shot but i run one and because of that my stock gm baby heads, stock unported intake, mild 550 lift hydraulic cam, stock ecu, down to a factory dented up oil pan has to run modpa with cars that have way way more combo.

    although my combo runs good for what it is (not trying to stroke my own shaft) seems the logical thing thing to do because you guys do it for turbo and supercharged guys , is just simply limit the jet to lets say a 150 or 200 shot or whatever.. direct ports DONT make any more power... ALL it comes down to is DISTRIBUTION and when your talking spray , distriubtion is very important from melting down an engine.

    opinons, thoughts?

  9. #86
    VIP Member


    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Name
    KYLE
    Vehicle
    95 MQBM Z28
    Location
    davison michigan
    Posts
    3,874

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by green96ta View Post
    There is something that I would like to address as far as the shootout. (Getting back on track!)

    The weight penalty for having a 4L80e.

    So everyone knows I'm going to do the 24x on the shop car. I am also going to swap a 4l80e, because it is just crazy not to. However, with it being a stronger transmission-it also has its own weight and time penalty built in. It is PROVEN to take more power to turn the 80e as opposed to the 60e. Which is a penalty in and of its self. Moreover, the 80e weighs more than the 60e already!

    So there are two reasons why I think the penalty should be removed. First because of the two points above. Secondly, because the 4L80e can be ran by an LT1 PCM.

    I understand why the 24x carries a weight penalty, it is a better system.

    But with the 80e its only a upgrade in the sense of what power it can handle, but if you go straight from a working 60e to an 80e and keep everything the same you will lose time and power. So the weight penalty adds insult to injury

    Plus if I run in extreme street, my car will have to weigh 3750 with the 80e and the 24x which is more than the car weighs stock weight with me in it.

    So currently I need a ( @popo8 Stop Reading here, and skip past the comma.) dead body for my trunk, or a willing LTxer to try and fit in the trunk while I run in a FULL WEIGHT TRANS AM with added weight.
    stuff shownomercy with a box full of dildos in the rear and you will make weight! lol!

  10. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to dawdaw For This Post:


  11. #87
    InActive Member


    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Name
    Walter Devine
    Vehicle
    1996 Z28 2002 Z28
    Location
    Rowletts, Kentucky
    Posts
    341

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dawdaw View Post
    question... with turbo and supercharged guys , they way you limit there power is by sizing correct?... why not do that in the extreme street power adder class and limit every guy to a certain jet size? seems like no one wants to pony up money for a direct port, or most don't need one for a smaller shot but i run one and because of that my stock gm baby heads, stock unported intake, mild 550 lift hydraulic cam, stock ecu, down to a factory dented up oil pan has to run modpa with cars that have way way more combo.

    although my combo runs good for what it is (not trying to stroke my own shaft) seems the logical thing thing to do because you guys do it for turbo and supercharged guys , is just simply limit the jet to lets say a 150 or 200 shot or whatever.. direct ports DONT make any more power... ALL it comes down to is DISTRIBUTION and when your talking spray , distriubtion is very important from melting down an engine.

    opinons, thoughts?
    IF you do this it will have to be limited to a .XXX nitrous jet. Different venders 150 or 200 shot is different from each other. With the set nitrous jet you wouldn't have to worry about low or high psi nitrous fuel systems. This wouldn't work for us direct port guys though or would have to have a difrent set number. Don't matter to me in extreme street cause I cant run in that class anyway.

    96 Z28 LT1 stroker, cage 9 inch, spray 10.24@134.58 1.54 60
    02 Z28 edge converter, LTs, lid, cam, spray 12.0@112N/A

  12. #88
    LTXTech Sponsor


    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Name
    David
    Vehicle
    1985 Camaro Z28/1994 Firebird Formula
    Location
    MO
    Posts
    918

    Default

    Nitrous cars in the ES P/A class is currently limited by only running a single nozzle or plate kit. Where Mod gets to run a direct port.
    -David-
    1985 Camaro Z28 (Under Construction)
    1994 Firebird Formula - LT1/4L60e (The Daily)

  13. #89
    VIP Member


    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Name
    KYLE
    Vehicle
    95 MQBM Z28
    Location
    davison michigan
    Posts
    3,874

    Default

    Guess I'll buy a plate then. Thanks for the answer

  14. #90

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by green96ta View Post
    There is something that I would like to address as far as the shootout. (Getting back on track!)

    The weight penalty for having a 4L80e.

    So everyone knows I'm going to do the 24x on the shop car. I am also going to swap a 4l80e, because it is just crazy not to. However, with it being a stronger transmission-it also has its own weight and time penalty built in. It is PROVEN to take more power to turn the 80e as opposed to the 60e. Which is a penalty in and of its self. Moreover, the 80e weighs more than the 60e already!

    So there are two reasons why I think the penalty should be removed. First because of the two points above. Secondly, because the 4L80e can be ran by an LT1 PCM.

    I understand why the 24x carries a weight penalty, it is a better system.

    But with the 80e its only a upgrade in the sense of what power it can handle, but if you go straight from a working 60e to an 80e and keep everything the same you will lose time and power. So the weight penalty adds insult to injury

    Plus if I run in extreme street, my car will have to weigh 3750 with the 80e and the 24x which is more than the car weighs stock weight with me in it.

    So currently I need a ( @popo8 Stop Reading here, and skip past the comma.) dead body for my trunk, or a willing LTxer to try and fit in the trunk while I run in a FULL WEIGHT TRANS AM with added weight.
    I agree with this. And I dont have one. Never really agreed with doing something stronger but slower to move you up a class
    Quote Originally Posted by dawdaw View Post
    question... with turbo and supercharged guys , they way you limit there power is by sizing correct?... why not do that in the extreme street power adder class and limit every guy to a certain jet size? seems like no one wants to pony up money for a direct port, or most don't need one for a smaller shot but i run one and because of that my stock gm baby heads, stock unported intake, mild 550 lift hydraulic cam, stock ecu, down to a factory dented up oil pan has to run modpa with cars that have way way more combo.

    although my combo runs good for what it is (not trying to stroke my own shaft) seems the logical thing thing to do because you guys do it for turbo and supercharged guys , is just simply limit the jet to lets say a 150 or 200 shot or whatever.. direct ports DONT make any more power... ALL it comes down to is DISTRIBUTION and when your talking spray , distriubtion is very important from melting down an engine.

    opinons, thoughts?
    Keep it up and youll be in outlaw next year so you wont have to worry about it.


    Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

Page 9 of 21 FirstFirst ... 567891011121319 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •