- Navigation
Results 1 to 4 of 4
Thread: cc465?
-
05-26-2009, 09:01 PM #1
InActive Member
- Status
- Offline
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Location
- NC, MT
- Posts
- 1,026
cc465?
anybody have any experience with this cam?
specs are 210@ .560/ 218@ .550 w/ a 113 LSA
-
05-26-2009, 09:10 PM #2
Lurker
- Status
- Offline
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Maryland
- Posts
- 277
I think thats the line of cams that eats valve springs from the cam lobe design if I'm not mistaken. If you do use it run 918's or nice PAC's. Honestly though if that is the case I would run a more conservative cam lobe saving you money on springs and only losing a few hp at most.
Yep its slow.
-
05-26-2009, 10:18 PM #3
InActive Member
- Status
- Offline
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Location
- NC, MT
- Posts
- 1,026
thanks im just looking around, havent decided on a cam yet, but im not gonna risk it with this one
-
05-27-2009, 12:07 PM #4
Lurker
- Status
- Offline
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Maryland
- Posts
- 277
The duration and lift are both good though, if you want a nice drivable mild cam. Its better to undercam then over, so I'd stick to this duration or maybe just a hair bit more if the car is your DD.
Look at the 502, 304, cadillac cam, crane 227, and some of the lower duration cams from Lloyd they all make great power too. The crane 227 and custom cam will probabaly be the best overall though. Good luck on your search!Yep its slow.
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks