- Navigation
Results 1 to 10 of 16
Thread: Main cap clearances
-
03-10-2014, 09:28 PM #1Lurker
- Status
- Offline
- Join Date
- Nov 2013
- Name
- David
- Vehicle
- 97 355 Green TA
- Location
- Deltona, FL
- Posts
- 303
Main cap clearances
Time to plastigauge, what am I aiming for? .002 - .003?
97 TA (Rebuilding):Stock bottom end 355, CAI, 52 TB, Ported intake and lt1 heads, 227/235 LE cam, Ultra-Pro-Mags 1.6RR's, Hooker LT's, single flowmaster, McLeod Clutch. Need a 9inch rear to handle the abuse
FLOGROWN
-
The Following User Says Thank You to MI6TA For This Post:
-
03-10-2014, 11:56 PM #2VIP Member
- Status
- Offline
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
- Name
- CHRIS
- Vehicle
- 94 CAMARO.
- Location
- Biloxi, MS
- Posts
- 1,342

Main bearing clearance?
Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk
-
03-11-2014, 04:00 AM #3
About right. Mines around .002-.0025 iirc
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
-
03-11-2014, 09:01 AM #4
Plastigauge gives a vague inaccurate reading.
John
-
03-11-2014, 08:54 PM #5Lurker
- Status
- Offline
- Join Date
- Nov 2013
- Name
- David
- Vehicle
- 97 355 Green TA
- Location
- Deltona, FL
- Posts
- 303
Yeah that's what I meant lol. Too many beers.
and @Featherburner what you talking about?97 TA (Rebuilding):Stock bottom end 355, CAI, 52 TB, Ported intake and lt1 heads, 227/235 LE cam, Ultra-Pro-Mags 1.6RR's, Hooker LT's, single flowmaster, McLeod Clutch. Need a 9inch rear to handle the abuse
FLOGROWN
-
03-11-2014, 09:13 PM #6LTXTech Sponsor
- Status
- Offline
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Name
- David
- Vehicle
- 1985 Camaro Z28/1994 Firebird Formula
- Location
- MO
- Posts
- 918
Plastigauge is not the best way to measure bearing clearance but it has worked many times on many engines. I am not an engine builder so take this with a grain of salt.
The abbreviated way is to install bearing in the mains without the crankshaft. Torque the bolts/studs to proper spec and measure inside bearing diameter. Then measure crankshaft journal and do the math to get the actual clearance.
Again I am NOT an engine builder, but that is how I understand the correct way to do it. I am sure someone will correct me soon.Last edited by DMBlack; 03-11-2014 at 09:43 PM.
-David-
1985 Camaro Z28 (Under Construction)
1994 Firebird Formula - LT1/4L60e (The Daily)
-
03-11-2014, 09:44 PM #7
No that is the correct way to do it. You do need accurate measuring tools though.
68 Mechanical Alcohol Injected LT1.
-
03-12-2014, 09:00 AM #8Lurker
- Status
- Offline
- Join Date
- Nov 2013
- Name
- David
- Vehicle
- 97 355 Green TA
- Location
- Deltona, FL
- Posts
- 303
Very accurate measuring tools indeed. I'll see if pops has tools that exact but I doubt it. Plastigauge will be the way we end up doing. So .002 to .0025 is within the area I'm shooting for?
97 TA (Rebuilding):Stock bottom end 355, CAI, 52 TB, Ported intake and lt1 heads, 227/235 LE cam, Ultra-Pro-Mags 1.6RR's, Hooker LT's, single flowmaster, McLeod Clutch. Need a 9inch rear to handle the abuse
FLOGROWN
-
03-12-2014, 10:02 AM #9
Nothing vague or inaccurate about my post. Have you ever compared actual measurements to plastigauge? I have. If you are OK with a plastigauge reading of "about" .0025 but could actually be .001 either way of that, be my guest. But for me, it was worth it to purchase the proper mics and bore gauges and learn how to use them.
John
-
03-12-2014, 10:06 AM #10LTXTech Sponsor
- Status
- Offline
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Name
- David
- Vehicle
- 1985 Camaro Z28/1994 Firebird Formula
- Location
- MO
- Posts
- 918
I agree that is the proper way to get it done. How about instead of just saying that is not the best way of doing it, explain the correct way? That could possibly stop some confusion and be a little more helpful.
-David-
1985 Camaro Z28 (Under Construction)
1994 Firebird Formula - LT1/4L60e (The Daily)
Reply With Quote

Bookmarks