- Navigation
Results 1 to 9 of 9
Thread: NA vs FI
-
11-07-2008, 11:10 PM #1
NA vs FI
Ok, Im bored, and i do not currently have the money to do anything like this anytime soon, and im not trying to start any kind of flaming war which i dont think is a problem here.
But anyways, say i was going to build a 500 rwhp engine, that i can drive anytime i want to without worrying about my car breaking down. Which is actually the cheaper route? A high revving N.A. motor or a supercharged/turbocharged application. I know FI is going to be more streetable, but which would be cheaper. Im not talking about a "budget build" but if everthing is done right from start to finish. Or is there not much of a difference.1997 Trans am- M6- Ebay Longtubes, Summit X pipe with Magnaflows, CAI, Adj LCAs with relocation brackets, Comp engineering shocks, Competition stage 2 clutch.
-
11-07-2008, 11:22 PM #2Lurker
- Status
- Offline
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
- Name
- Jay
- Vehicle
- 1996 Camaro Zed28
- Location
- take a guess...
- Posts
- 2,878
a big inch fully forged turbocharged LTX would be my weapon of choice.
jay
-
11-07-2008, 11:23 PM #3
Id say from a relyability standpoint, both would be alright if built and tuned correctly.... Theres lots of Fcars roaming the streets with 500+rwhp.... It will boil down to what you like best, both will be streetable if you build it with that in mind....
If it were me, I would do the N/A just because you have to love a big motor
Both will no doubt be expensive though, but how much $$$ its going to cost will depend on how much HP you want to make...Nick
- 2003 SVT Cobra T56/4.6L - Pullied, Tuned, Full Intake/Exhaust, Stg3 Clutch (29k) - 483rwhp @14-15psi
- 2002 Ford F350 7.3L Powerstroke - Edge Evo II/33" BFG AT TAs/4" MBRP Turbo Back + Intake (164k)
- 1995 Pontiac Firehawk #224 (Chameleon) - Full Bolton/Cammed/Full Suspension (71k) - 12.75 @ 107.94
http://www.fquick.com/Fixxer777

-
11-07-2008, 11:34 PM #4
I guess im more asking for which would be a cheaper build in the long run, instead of just preference, or are they both about the same.
1997 Trans am- M6- Ebay Longtubes, Summit X pipe with Magnaflows, CAI, Adj LCAs with relocation brackets, Comp engineering shocks, Competition stage 2 clutch.
-
11-08-2008, 12:16 AM #5
h/c with spray would be the cheapest
and since noone really NEEDS 500hp all the time it might be the best way to go
just a thought2004 gto
1995 z28 going
2004 grand prix GTP(DD)gone
-
11-08-2008, 12:21 AM #6
To get 500rwhp N/A your gonna have to have a pretty nasty set up. High compression and a pretty good sized cam are gonna be a must. Doesnt make for the best daily driver.
-
11-08-2008, 01:42 AM #7Long Live the Opti
- Status
- Offline
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
- Name
- Sean
- Vehicle
- 1999 Twin Turbo Corvette
- Location
- Fort Wayne, IN
- Posts
- 12,072
Cheaper?? N/A for sure. A Solid Roller stroker with some aftermarket heads (TFS would be my choice) would get you there.
But.....having almost gone that route myself, I went FI because you get the best of both worlds. Driveability and insane power. It costs quite a bit more though.
-
11-09-2008, 02:35 PM #8
Thanks for the responses. Just something ive always wondered. I knew there were alot of guys making big numbers with stock heads and cam with FI, with a built bottom end, and then there are the guys with aftermarket top ends and built bottom ends, making big numbers too. I new the cheapest though would be nitrous.
1997 Trans am- M6- Ebay Longtubes, Summit X pipe with Magnaflows, CAI, Adj LCAs with relocation brackets, Comp engineering shocks, Competition stage 2 clutch.
-
11-09-2008, 03:04 PM #9
LE2 set up on a 100 shot should get you there easy!

Reply With Quote


Bookmarks