- Navigation
Results 1 to 5 of 5
Thread: EBC
-
10-10-2008, 08:45 AM #1Pr0jekt Turb0?
- Status
- Offline
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
- Name
- Ryan
- Vehicle
- 1993 Camaro Z28
- Location
- Utica, NY + Jacksonville, FL
- Posts
- 3,645


EBC
I've been reading up on a selection of EBC's for my turbo project and I'm just lost on which one I want.
there's the EBOOST2, TRU-BOOST, or APEXi AVC-R
Now I was pretty set on the TRU-BOOST as it's the simplest but I've read up and people still have trouble with the boost tapering off in the upper rpms like a MBC.
I like the features of the EBOOST2 and the APEXi but their price is substantially more than the TRU-BOOST and then there is the problem of mounting them.
the EBOOST2 is a 60mm gauge and won't fit in my 52mm gauge pod and the APEXi is a rectangular controller
The TRU BOOST is 52mm and would fit perfect but I wont deal with boost bleeding off in the higher rpms.
both the EBOOST and the APEXi also have boost per gear tuning which will help alot with traction as I will be on street tires the majority of the time.
Is the extra $$ worth it for these (I know this depends on my own mindset but what do ya'll think)
I don't need the best of the best but I won't settle for loosing boost in the upper rpms..
I plan on 10psi the majority of the time and another setting on 15psi
-
10-16-2008, 09:09 AM #2Pr0jekt Turb0?
- Status
- Offline
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
- Name
- Ryan
- Vehicle
- 1993 Camaro Z28
- Location
- Utica, NY + Jacksonville, FL
- Posts
- 3,645


nobody?
-
10-16-2008, 10:52 PM #3
I also need to buy one and need to know whats the best for the money..
-
10-17-2008, 12:10 PM #4
Lurker
- Status
- Offline
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Posts
- 41
unless you just need the benefits of a boost per gear or other options of the Eboost2, why no go with a MBC with a heavier spring for the check ball and a lighter spring in the wastegate.. this will cure the peak and taper off effect of a std MBC. it is pretty common that people trying to adjust only a pound or two of boost run into this problem because when the MBC opens it takes a second for the heavy spring in the wastegate to open and then they both finally settle down where they are supposed to be.. by going with a real light wastegate spring and using a heavier spring in the MBC this fixes it by having a bigger spread of what p[ressure is required to open the gate and how fast it can respond to boost. just a thought that may save ya some money!
also to me a MBC is simply hard to beat once you know how to set it up they are generally extremely easy and reliable and steady boost through the RPM range!
CHris
-
10-17-2008, 12:34 PM #5Pr0jekt Turb0?
- Status
- Offline
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
- Name
- Ryan
- Vehicle
- 1993 Camaro Z28
- Location
- Utica, NY + Jacksonville, FL
- Posts
- 3,645


I understand the thought process there, my buddy runs a MBC in his regal.. it's just that I want complete accuracy when it comes to boost pressure and turning a knob isn't always the most accurate, especially since MBC are extremely sensitive to weather conditions, and I regularly go between FL and NY.
I would prefer an EBC because of what you said for the boost per gear.. I don't plan on putting sticky tires on the car until I have the money for an S60 or 9 inch, so I'd rather not be all over the place in the first couple gears..
This will also be my first car I've ever driven with over 400whp so it'll be a big learning curve for my driving ability and I think an EBC would help me with that
Reply With Quote

Bookmarks