The personal attacks are derived from trying to deal with someone so hard headed that you can't get through to them. How many transmissions have YOU built? How long have you been doing this for a living? Why is my "opinion" more plausible than Jakes? I've explained this numerous times but you're too thick headed to understand it... I build BOTH transmissions, and my 4L60E reputation speaks for itself. Again, I know it's like talking to a wall, but here goes again. Atleast the other people reading this thread will be smart enough to grasp this. I build 4L80E. I have them in low 10 second turbo LS cars. It would cost me less money to build 4L80s than 4L60Es. My profit margin would be wider. The ONLY reason I would push a 4L80E is if I didn't know how to build a 4L60E because I know it's not the right transmission for the vehicle. Go back to Jakes FAQ page. See where he lists the fictitious weight difference between a 60 and an 80? Why would you believe anything else on that page when we already know that's fictitious. I could go through all the trouble an expense to do back to back tests, but you would still try to promote your alternate reality to keep from admitting the truth. I could post dyno sheets and videos, but in all your thick headedness, you'd claim it was all rigged. You made a mistake. You put the wrong trans in your car. I know misery loves company, but stop trying to drag others down with you. Now, lets bring up one other issue. Weren't you just on another forum a few months ago trying to diagnose problems with your 4L80E? I thought you guys all claimed they never fail? That's not adding a whole bunch of credibility to your arguement is it?
Frank
