The bad side to the swing towards more gun rights. IMO.
Printable View
The bad side to the swing towards more gun rights. IMO.
If an applicant has passed a training course and written test then by all means he should be able to carry. Some of us have been using firearms since an early age. Don't get your liberalesque, jersey shore panties in a twist there, man-crush.Quote:
Originally Posted by shownomercy
Call.it however you guys want. I just registered to take my course November 23rd
Good deal.Quote:
Originally Posted by 30thSSclone
I have to say IMO if a man can go to war and fight and risk his life for his country, then he should have the right to protect it at home. if 19 isnt old enough to protect himself then you need to raise the age that a man can join the military to 21. JMO
I'll go one further if you're old enough to die for your country you're old enough to have a freaking beerQuote:
Originally Posted by superspirit
I agree 100%
But with that "old enough to die for your country"part...comes alot of training and dicipline.... its not the age... its the military preperation.Quote:
Originally Posted by 95albinobird
A 19 year old wants to join the military... and also have a permit to carry ...im fine with that.
A joe shmo off the street turns 19... absolutely not...2 immature to carry responsibly.
You may consider me a "Joe shmo" but I'll bet money I have more range time than a lot of people twice my age
Range time is not training in proper use for self defense or use against another human being. Nor is it dicipline or responsibility...Quote:
Originally Posted by 30thSSclone
Your comment is exactly the point im making of what someone ur age is lacking. Its not about range time or how well u hit the target.
So yes... I do consider u a joe shmo...and def NOT ready to varry a concealed weapon for purpose of responsible use.