Cool car! This would be a pretty good look if you get tired of the black!https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...e69a8ff176.jpg
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Printable View
Cool car! This would be a pretty good look if you get tired of the black!https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...e69a8ff176.jpg
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Lol, it definitely would be cool... but since mine is an lt1 car, it has the wrong front and rear bumpers to replicate facemans car.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cathead
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Wait whats wrong with SD tuning?
Finding someone to burn chips on a stock applocation.Quote:
Originally Posted by shownomercy
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Oh, you are speaking of LTx problems.Quote:
Originally Posted by popo8
U know... since this is LTX tech and all... lolQuote:
Originally Posted by shownomercy
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Hey Larry, just an FYI, the old PCMForLess chip guy Alvin is running PCMofNC and has been for years now. He still does chip burning. You could easily get away with your typical bolt on's and even most off the shelf heads and cam setups and have him mail order tune it and be fine. He's a whiz with the chip cars. Don't limit yourself to bone stock.....you should be able to bolt on your way to about 300 RWHP with the car which would put it at stock C5 power levels at least.
When I first got my current car i ditched the MAF sensor and went speed density. The car absolutely love being on nitrous. Just tossing that out there.
Cool deal there.
Sent from my HP Pro Slate 8 using Tapatalk
Ur missing the point. It's not the ss that's the issue... it's the fact that 93 requires chips burned to tune.Quote:
Originally Posted by zooguy
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk