BACON BITES!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NuckinFutz93

3 Weeks. I'll be in the 26th,

---

Oh my bad, I can't count this morning lol. So 26-28th?

Yeah, I'm leaving heading home the 29th,

Cool cool, looking forward to hanging out!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Blackbird96WS6

Sweet, post up some numbers when you're done!

---

I will hoping to hit 430 with some tuning and changes i made.

Im going to be on a dynapack. Never ran on one before. So not sure how they are to dynojets...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Blackbird96WS6

Cool cool, looking forward to hanging out!

---

Me too!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MeanTA

I will hoping to hit 430 with some tuning and changes i made.

Im going to be on a dynapack. Never ran on one before. So not sure how they are to dynojets...

---

No mustang dynos in your area?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MeanTA

I will hoping to hit 430 with some tuning and changes i made.

Im going to be on a dynapack. Never ran on one before. So not sure how they are to dynojets...

---

You'll see about 4-5% higher numbers on a Dynapack vs a Jet. Plus you don't have to deal with tire slippage on the rollers either.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Blackbird96WS6

No mustang dynos in your area?

---

I thank so. But i am meeting up with the tuner at his place.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NuckinFutz93

You'll see about 4-5% higher numbers on a Dynapack vs a Jet. Plus you don't have to deal with tire slippage on the rollers either.

---

So is it more accurate then?

And you don't have to worry about them straping down your car wrong

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MeanTA

So is it more accurate then?

---

If the same guy set up both dynos and ran them, I would say yes, but it's like any dyno discussion, everyone will have their own opinion. I think they are. My car has lost traction on the rollers more than once.