Printable View
I'm one of those Larry. For me its because everyone thinks its the best thing ever because it says Corvette on it. Although there are certain models I would rockQuote:
Originally Posted by popo8
C4 ZR1
C4 GS
C2 427
C2 Split window
C3 early stingray when they had metal bumpers
Any C1
C5 Z06
C6 ZR1 - oooooh yeah...
Your right... but I gotta say, there is something fun about the simplicity of it...
tucked in the car...sitting sooooo low in it, feeling like the cockpit is wrapped around you and with NO mods, the biatch handles.... Now my dream car was always the C4 GS... and thats why I got it... but I wouldve gotten a C4 at some point for a DD to save the camaro...
all i can hope for is that ugly thing to cause the price of C5's to drop in to my price range.
I really want an 83' ...:rotfl:. But seriously, I would rock an ordinary 6spd C5.
Check this links:
http://gmauthority.com/blog/2012/12/...january-debut/
http://www.boldride.com/blog/2012/12...to-suck/19630/
It looks like the car is going to look just like the car and driver article... if that's the case I think it will suck style wise...
It's been a long wait to see this car and now my expectative is low on this car... but who knows... we'll see on January 13th
I think with any new car it's hard to get the full scope of how it looks when you're only seeing these leaked pictures. That's why GM (and the rest of the auto manufacturers) hate when people leak pictures because the leaked pics don't allow GM to control your first impression of the car. Instead the first impressions are from drawings that may have proportions wrong, renderings that may or may not be accurate, etc.
That said - being in the Detroit area and working for GM, well all I can say is that I know someone who has seen the pre-production C7 with his own eyes and although he wouldn't share much he did say that he thought it was drop dead gorgeous. Grain of salt, but I'm holding my opinions of the car until I see it in person.
Edit: Wow I just read that Boldride.com blog article - that was one of the most poorly written articles I've read in a long time.