Become a ltxtech.com member, Click here to register!
BP-Automotive

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23
  1. #11

    Default

    Peak hp may improve , but torque will suffer. In theory sounds great but unless you running a big sbc (big as in 420+) you may be disappointed at the outcome. Hence , why I never converted a super Vic. Looking for plenum volume or plenum velocity? Kind of like heads , big flow numbers mean jack at .700 if .200-.500 suffer. I mean I ran 9.34 with heads that only flowed 304cfm peak ,although that was at .500 lift . Just giving a example : of sometimes you give up one place to maybe gain just. Little somewhere else. If you did do the swap by all means give post up any new results.....

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Joe O For This Post:


  3. #12
    Lurker


    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Name
    Alex Rauld
    Vehicle
    1994 Trans Am GT
    Posts
    226

    Default

    What heads did you run Joe?

  4. #13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by myltwon View Post
    What heads did you run Joe?
    Afr 227's ( not out of box raw casting ported by my buddy EB
    Last edited by Joe O; 02-07-2018 at 10:17 PM.

  5. #14
    Lurker


    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Name
    Mike Glick
    Vehicle
    1997 Camaro SS, 93 Z/28
    Posts
    36

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joe O View Post
    Peak hp may improve , but torque will suffer. In theory sounds great but unless you running a big sbc (big as in 420+) you may be disappointed at the outcome. Hence , why I never converted a super Vic. Looking for plenum volume or plenum velocity? Kind of like heads , big flow numbers mean jack at .700 if .200-.500 suffer. I mean I ran 9.34 with heads that only flowed 304cfm peak ,although that was at .500 lift . Just giving a example : of sometimes you give up one place to maybe gain just. Little somewhere else. If you did do the swap by all means give post up any new results.....
    Thanks for the post Joe. I haven't swapped yet, but it's wintertime here in the Northeast. I have a Holley Strip Dominator being worked on right now. I will post up results, good or bad, when springtime rolls around. The good news with intake manifold swaps, is they aren't difficult to undo if they don't work....lol

  6. #15

    Default

    Absolutely.. correct for as easy of a swap it is .. as I said I'm not saying you won't gain... your combo may want more plenum volume.. I've seen some combos lose a low and midrange torque.. depends really on your whole setup. How it would affect 1 vs. another.. quite possible you could find a golden egg.

  7. #16

    Default

    You have to factor in what you are using the car for as well. If it's a drag car with a big converter say 5000+, then sacrificing some torque down low won't make a bit of difference.
    '94 coupe, 10.15 at 133.65 414" LT1, 4500 stall, n/a, pump gas, mufflers, street trim
    '15 Z/28, Red Hot, AC, Autocross beast

  8. #17
    Lurker


    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Name
    Mike Glick
    Vehicle
    1997 Camaro SS, 93 Z/28
    Posts
    36

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joelster View Post
    You have to factor in what you are using the car for as well. If it's a drag car with a big converter say 5000+, then sacrificing some torque down low won't make a bit of difference.
    That's exactly what it is. It's a drag race only car with a converter that stalls around 5 grand or so. On the dyno the motor made peak torque at 5100 with the Victor Jr

  9. #18

    Default

    Sorry, but can I ask why you went with Carbureted?
    Last edited by Joe O; 02-09-2018 at 11:25 AM.

  10. #19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sseeya View Post
    That's exactly what it is. It's a drag race only car with a converter that stalls around 5 grand or so. On the dyno the motor made peak torque at 5100 with the Victor Jr
    That's kind of what I was getting at , that and if you had a high rpm cam selection.

  11. #20
    Lurker


    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Name
    Mike Glick
    Vehicle
    1997 Camaro SS, 93 Z/28
    Posts
    36

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joe O View Post
    Sorry, but can I ask why you went with Carbureted?
    Main reason is because it's a race only vehicle and I have a buddy who's really good with carbs. At the time it was just easier and cheaper to just throw a carb on it and go racing. I may eventually switch to EFI, you never know.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •